Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Get A Free Revenue Cycle Management Assessment

Register Now

Streamline Your RCM Strategy in 2025 – The Exclusive Checklist

Download Now

Get A Free Revenue Cycle Management Assessment

Register Now

Streamline Your RCM Strategy in 2025 – The Exclusive Checklist

Download Now

discover

CASE STUDIES

by Plutus Health

home
CASE STUDIES
home
Case studies
July 4, 2025

How Plutus Health Reduced Legacy AR by $2M and Achieved 97%+ NCR for a $200M ABA Network 

by Plutus Health
Coding Quality of Nephrology Practice Reached 98%Download PDF

Client Profile

Specialty: ABA Services

Location: USA

Size: Over 3,500 providers and 4,000 clients

Annual Revenue: $200M+  

This case study shows how a $200M ABA provider reduced legacy AR and denial rates while achieving 97%+ collections through a clean, structured RCM rebuild.

The Challenges:

A large national ABA provider was growing fast but struggling to manage a fragmented and inefficient RCM operation.

  • Limited visibility into billing performance from their prior vendor
  • Delayed claims follow-up and 4+ month payment lags
  • Denial rates consistently exceeding 10%
  • Credentialing mismatches and group NPI billing errors
  • Preventable denials due to missing documentation and incorrect setup
  • Inactive coverage services due to lack of eligibility checks  

Plutus Health Plan of Action:

Data was collected from various sources, including financial records, billing data, and patient information. The data collection methods included:

  • Reviewing historical claim data.
  • Analyzing billing, payments, and AR data.
  • Conducting interviews with staff involved in the RCM process.

Issues Detected:  

  • Incorrect billing under group NPI for a specific payer, despite requirements for individual NPI - resulted in ~$4.5M in under collections
  • Delayed payments due to medical records audits, with missing documentation (treatment plans, session notes, etc.) led to ~$500K in delayed collections and payer audit flag
  • Credentialing mismatches for two practice locations, causing denial of all associated claims — ~$1.5M in revenue impact
  • Lack of standardized billing procedures, leading to session time errors and duplicate denials post-submission
  • No structured eligibility verification, resulting in services rendered for patients with inactive coverage
  • Authorization-related denials across multiple payers due to missing or mismatched auth details during transmission

Download Case Study


Website


Website
*We Value Your Privacy.
*We Value Your Privacy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.